Looking for:
Roon: how Roon works and how to try it for free | What Hi-Fi?
I decided to audition Roon in early not sure what version with the free trial, mainly because of the multi-room, multi-device capabilities. Roon sounded somewhat flat, lacking atmosphere and depth in comparison. Roon also integrated my personal library very well with Tidal. After several months, all the extra features of Roon compelled me to purchase Roon.
A year later, I now essentially use Roon most of the time, because of the interface and convenience of remote controls for all zones.
Surprisingly the Radio is excellent feature I did not realize I would enjoy as much as I do. When I do more dedicated listening in my main system, I still use Audirvana. I will say, I think the Roon audio quality has improved over the last year, although I have not tried any direct comparison.
I’ll put in another vote for Audirvana. I use it exclusively on a mac mini server and run it from the very good iPad app. Sound quality is excellent. I have used Roon a lot and I think the interface is terrible.
It is so convoluted and cumbersome to navigate. Roon does have a little more flexibility in terms of browsing Tidal, but I don’t think it is fun to use. FWIW this is coming from someone age 33 so it is not like I am a geezer struggling to use new technology! I do run Audirvana on my PC. I have been using Bluesound, but recently I had a problem where I could not use it for a month. Thanks everyone. Can I ask what you have Audirvana running on? On another note, my Mac storage is hybrid solid state and mechanical, which in theory is not supposed to be as good as pure solid state due to added noise on the USB line as well as emitted noise.
Not sure this is proven to have an effect though. The core is supposed to be connected via Ethernet for maximum SQ. Anyhow, just wondering if some who are saying Roon is inferior may be deploying the core and player on one single device which is connected to the DAC.
I have tried Audirvana Plus with the free trial, but really don’t see what the big deal is or why I should get Roon. I understand how some people like all the additional information it provides, but if I really care, it’s easy enough to go to Allmusic. I couldn’t tell any difference between Foobar and Audirvana and Foobar is free. It is a little more fussy, it took some time to figure out how to play DSD files for example, but it’s all good now.
I think Audirvana Plus is outstanding. I did a brief free Roon trial after installing Audirvana and thought Roon degraded the sound subtly. After I turn off Audirvana I noticed occasionally the Printer settings would have to be reset. Not a big deal, but annoying. I have also heard that the updates can be problematic and was advised not to do them. I can’t answer the question directly as I have never tried Roon.
All I can say is; I have been using Audirvana Plus for several years now and have no plans to change anything. I am very pleased with the interface and the player works extremely well for me. I am there? I keep trying Audirvana but going back to BitPerfect.
Cheap and effective. Two years ago I decided to try Roon 1. I immediately preferred the Roon presentation. And that’s without factoring in the file management and especially the radio function of Roon – which is probably the biggest difference. So last year I coughed up the Roon lifetime membership fee with no looking back.
In my experience, you get what you pay for. Log in to respond. More to discover Grado Statement cartridges – load at Lower Powered Tube Integrated for Stu Guys – re: piCorePlayer. You appear to have missed that the OP already has some AirPlay supporting Cambridge Audio speakers, a Cambridge Audio CXN and a mysterious ‘PC’, all apparently ready to be used as the network music players – so doesn’t appear to need piCorePlayer’s own Squeezelite network music player.
Also, I would have partially agreed with you if you had mentioned precisely what piCorePlayer is actually using as its ‘core’ – the free Logitech Media Server. Thanks all. Yes Volumio was ‘briefly’ considered as I’d been told it was a cheaper alternative to Roon, which, after looking isn’t. I’ve got JRiver to work but it’s a little clunky compared to Roon. It’s running headless at the moment as I’m trialing Roon and it seems to be more than capable. That PC itself doesn’t play anything, it’s just the Roon core.
I have a PC in the living room which does play music, and iMac for work which I also use for background music when I’m working.
I have an iphone, and my wife iphone and ipad which are all used. We have a Cambridge Audio Airplay speaker in the kitchen and one in the dining room. I’ve not found anything with the simplicity of Roon to allow me to play from anything to anything.
It’s very versatile. My problem is a subscription to play something which is actually mine on something I own! It’s only used for my music, no streaming services.
This is why I’d prefer to purchase software rather than be held to ransom if prices increase etc. There is no doubting though that the quality Roon outputs is out of this world. I’ll check out LMS if it can do all the above but it looks like I may have to stick down the subscription route. However, LMS can’t compete with Roon’s user interface, which is arguably second to none and is its actual main selling point – rather than its audio quality.
Cebolla said:. Incidentally, what’s this ‘anything’ you’re currently playing on Roon? Last edited: Nov 22, Chalklands Active Member. For what its worth. I used to use Roon, but then found MusicBee, which is free. I have it on my laptop connected to my CXN via wifi then connect the CXN to my main hifi in the living room phono and to bluetooth speakers in the kitchen via a bluetooth transmitter connected to the CXN.
I use the dual screen setting in windows using my TV as a second screen. That way I can use my laptop normally whilst having musicbee displayed on the TV There is also an android MusicBee mobile control app that I have on my phone.
Works fine for me. Don’t use spotify etc so can’t comment. Last edited: Nov 24, Chalklands said:. You could try asking the MusicBee forum, they’re normally very helpful I’ve found Much like here! EtheAv8r Standard Member. The price of the Annual subscription for Roon has not changed, and is unlikely to any time soon.
The Lifetime option did take nearly 4. So you could still go with Roon with the annual subscription knowing that in 2 or 3 years time if something better emerges you can switch safe in the knowledge that you have had the best option available at the time and can really judge if an alternative is indeed a better solution.. Expectations are that Roon will eventually completely withdraw the Lifetime option, and run solely on annual and who knows, maybe monthly subscription basis.
Withdrawal of Lifetime might only be a few months away. Roon also does not have Alexa support, whereas there is a full-featured skill for controlling Logitech Media Server. Khazul Well-known Member. Timmy C Distinguished Member. Assuming you’ve also been keeping your LMS reasonably up to date over those years, so running a 7.
It should be available by default, ready to install now, with the rest of the free plugins in LMS’s plugins setup page, 3rd party section. Last edited: Dec 21, I only ever look at the plugins if I want it to do something new like when I had a Tidal trial. I found the Material Skin plugin earlier but will look for the Info plugin later. Am I right in thinking the Material skin is simply cosmetic or does it add anything new?
Yes, purely cosmetic, though hopefully you’d agree much better than the default LMS web browser player controller – which would certainly not have impressed the OP used to Roon’s UI and the only reason why I mentioned it in my previous posts. JPanda Standard Member. Interesting thread – I have been running Squeezeboxes for over 12 years.
I have 4 Duets’s and a Squeezebox Boom. I used to run my own LMS to serve up my content from my network, but for the last 7 years have ditched that and use mysqueezebox.
Roon vs audirvana sound quality free download
Playing the same song back to back via Roon and via the Qobuz native основываясь на этих данных, there is no question that the latter sounds better. The Roon rendition sounds thinner and less lifelike. Both are being played back on the same system:. All roon vs audirvana sound quality free download Roon components are running on this machine, which I know is not the top recommendation for sound quality.
ROCK incoming in the next month or so. However, the SQ argument there is electrical noise, which I would expect to affect all sources equally. Both apps are set up to use the DAC in WSAPI Exclusive mode, which does make volume-matched comparisons difficult though in theory they should be roon vs audirvana sound quality free download same since both are in Exclusive modesince I have roon vs audirvana sound quality free download close one app before another can talk to the DAC.
No DSP or processing of any kind is enabled in either app. But the difference is not subtle at all. It is almost like swapping out my Clears for Как сообщается здесь earbuds. Is there a structural issue with having Roon vs audirvana sound quality free download co-located that is over and above electrical noise, and this should resolve itself once Core is offloaded to ROCK?
Roon does automatically engage DSP on some songs, to convert to either 48 or 96Khz, because apparently this quuality does not play But regardless of avid media composer 8 manual pdf free download DSP gets into the mix or not, both apps sound the same to me.
It sounds as though you have an issue with the setup somewhere. Your hunches about what should sound the same are right. Can you post screenshots of your Roon signal path when playing from the PC продолжить the Galaxy This might help diagnose the issue. BTW this made me giggle, it suggests that the difference is pretty undeniable whether you expect it or not.
All looks fine there. Roon unlike other apps is very active and roon vs audirvana sound quality free download on CPU activity and this includes Qobuz app which is pretty benign. Roon do recommend to not have the core attached to audio equipment due to this to get the best from it. As excessive CPU activity can affect sq and not all pcs usb sections are frer best for audio.
However It does seem to be rather DAC dependant though. Your not doing anything wrong but separating might make a big difference. It does use about 1. You will find similar reports across various subforums here. Root cause unknown. Eound imply Roon to be bit perfect roon vs audirvana sound quality free download other software to add DSP coloring. However that would be a rather widespread issue it seems. I downloaded and applied the convolution filters for the Clear, and it made a world of difference.
I take that as a good sign that the filter is damn close to uadirvana mark. Opportunity for some minor tweaks?
But much closer to ideal. I saw this in Roon weekly and would like to add a remark in the confirmative. I have tested Roon against Audirvana. Last month. It was using a 2. No doubt, despite Roon reporting perfect signal chain, Audirvana was several steps better, in an direct audible manner. I have full output down to 18Hz. No tweaks of any kind was done. Others have reported the same on Audirvana forums. I dont have time to investigate at the moment, but if some installs Audirvana trial and experience the same, one clue could be to investigate and compare the respective default settings and spot a difference.
But it could also be things like different handling tree roon vs audirvana sound quality free download USB dac output, etc. The machine is a macbook pro running Windows much better than native windows machines as a digretion. And then perhaps Roon is less compliant to older USB outputs? These were my thoughts…. Unfortunately for me at leastwhile the Audirvana is better sounding, it is just too buggy in their remote systems, especially the Android remote is too immature for practical use at the moment.
The user comfort of Roon is in another league. I decided to stick with Roon solely because of audirvvana bugs. But I will probably check in on Audirvana in half a audlrvana or so. I was intrigued! Audirvana HAS done something that Roon has not. I find Audirvana 3. In qualitj setup this is not complimenting the sound in any way. Just too bright but it may sound awesome in other setups.
Well danny might definitely like to contribute here and clarify some prejudice. Will have to connect my RME and do a bit perfect test. After reading these comments I stick to my own, that the difference could be related to e. In my setup, Audirvana is not bright, but more natural sounding. I have a newer macbook 19 pro as well, and also this machine has both WIndows bootcamp and MacOs installed.
They are separate partitions on the disk and I can start either. On one occassion, I found the newer mac better sounding than the older one, but this is a premature observation that really needs investigation.
Siund again, some difference in the laptop hardware could be the cause. I find Audirvana sounding differently when turning on exclusive mode on my macbook smh… but yeah I agree with you.
Audirvana does change the sound. If you like it or not is up to you. Audirvana 3. Audirvana Studio is just crap imo… I dont qyality it at all. In terms of bit perfect output, audlrvana – unless it is misconfigured usually not exclusive mode may imply the OS вот ссылка is destroying bit perfectness. For a notebook computer, also check whether you hear a SQ difference when it is charging vs the power supply unplugged from both the notebook and the electricity socket.
Over all these years your posts indicate you refused to accept SQ difference from bit perfect streams. The truth is out there. The key thing is to realize SQ is an analog thing. You are not hearing bits, but an analog conversion of the bits. Qobuz direct Roon Software Qobuz. Hi there, You will find similar reports across various subforums here. Welcome to Roon. These were my thoughts… Unfortunately for me at leastwhile the Audirvana is better sounding, it is just too buggy in their remote systems, especially the Android remote is too immature for practical use at the moment.
On Mac or Windows? On Mac I prefer Roon no doubt. Edit: Nevermind. Windows on a Mac…. That has always been my theory.